[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ntbugtraq
Subject:    Re: PING: Outlook 2003 Spam
From:       "http-equiv () excite ! com" <1 () MALWARE ! COM>
Date:       2004-06-04 21:06:50
Message-ID: 200406042106.i54L6oh4008912 () web170 ! megawebservers ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I think Mark might be onto something both the vml and the copies
of named files in the temp folder no longer appear to occur:

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10323
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10307

Those notes are dated 10th and 11th May. On the machine they no
longer work on, we have a couple XP so-called 'patches' from
14th May and 17th May with 3 or 4 office update folders with
files created on 17th May as well.

How's that for service. Quick, silent patching ! No need to
bother anyone ! Well done lads. You see you can do it. When the
resultant bug affects your bread and butter as it were, multiple
billions of dollars can be thrown at the problem and a fix
provided under a week. Silently too ! This despite the PR flack
machine claiming all sorts of nonsense excuses about testing on
all sorts of machines.

Bravo to Microsoft ! When they have to they can ! 5 gold stars !

[unless of course if our little XP test machines are broken and
we are seeing things]

"Spencer, Mark" <mspencer@evidentdata.com> said:
  Is it
possible
> Microsoft has already patched Outlook 2003

-----
NTBugtraq Editor's Note:

Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that \
just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the \
individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of \
Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, \
you''ll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: \
                field.
-----


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic