[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] exit_notify: kill the wrong capable(CAP_KILL) check
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge () hallyn ! com>
Date: 2009-02-25 23:54:09
Message-ID: 20090225235409.GA2443 () hallyn ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@redhat.com):
> On 02/25, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@redhat.com):
> > > On 02/25, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@redhat.com):
> > > > > On 02/25, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > > > Can't understand... Why do you think CAP_KILL makes things better?
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually, how can it make any difference in this case?
> > > >
> > > > Well the check by itself isn't quite right - it seems to me it
> > > > should also check whether tsk->euid == parent->uid. But letting
> > > > an unprivileged task send SIGSTOP to a privileged one bc of
> > > > some fluke in the task hierarchy doesn't seem right.
> > >
> > > I think you misread this CAP_KILL check.
> > >
> > > It does not restrict the unprivileged task to send the signal. Instead,
> > > if the exiting task has CAP_KILL, we bypass other security checks.
> >
> > ? If the exiting task does not have CAP_KILL,
>
> _and_ (not "or") the execution domains for parent/chils are different,
>
> > we set the signal to
> > SIGCHILD (which is deemed safe).
>
> Yes. So why we should not set the signal to SIGCHLD if the task has
> CAP_KILL ?
Yeah, you're right, I wasn't thinking right.
> And again, the malicious application can exec the setuid binary before
> exit, in this case we never reset ->exit_signal (of course, unless
> that binary drops CAP_KILL).
Heh, thanks for taking the time to set me straight.
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Thanks.
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic