[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: bugtraq
Subject: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows
From: jinc4fareijj () hotmail ! com
Date: 2007-10-03 16:06:29
Message-ID: 20071003160629.13184.qmail () securityfocus ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Yipiya Ypipiya yah yeah. Here is a 0day! hurra mIRC pwns your Windozes! (ref. pdp)
send this to a user and make him double click on it (masquerade it with pink \
fore/background color and say 'free pr0n click here ->' it works all the time! damned \
perverts): mailto:%xx../../../../../../../../../../../windows/system32/calc.exe".bat
Now the question is, should we say *0day* for a bug in a core element that is WELL \
KNOWN by everyone (reported months ago), and will be patched, or should we try to get \
credits for finding a *vector* as pdp did with the supposed *acrobat reader pdf bug* \
?
Fame kills bugs.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic