[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       best-of-security
Subject:    BoS: noise levels
From:       Julian Assange <proff () suburbia ! net>
Date:       1996-03-14 7:47:28
[Download RAW message or body]

Best-of-security is not for discussion. 

In BoS's case you can judge the book by its title.

Please read and understand the attached BoS policy.

--mod


	           Best of all available security resources.

		    _/_/_/          _/_/          _/_/_/
		   _/    _/      _/    _/      _/
		  _/_/_/        _/    _/        _/_/
		 _/    _/      _/    _/            _/
		_/_/_/          _/_/        _/_/_/

		Best            Of         Security

"echo subscribe best-of-security|mail best-of-security-request@suburbia.net"

REASONS FOR INCEPTION
---------------------

    In order to compile the average security administrator it was found
    that the compiler had to parse a foreboding number of exceptionally
    noisy and semantically-content-free data sets.  This led to
    exceptionally high load averages and a dramatic increase in core
    entropy.

    Further, the number, names and locations of this data appears to
    change on an almost daily basis; requiring tedious version control
    on the part of the mental maintainer.


OVERVIEW
---------

    Best-of-Security is at present an un-moderated list. That may sound
    strange given our stated purpose of massive entropy reduction; but
    because best often equates with "vital" and the moderator doesn't
    have an MDA habit it is important that material sent to this list
    be delivered to its subscribers' in as minimal period of time as
    is (in)humanly possible.

    If you find *any* information from *any* source (including other
    mailinglists, newsgroups, conference notes, papers, etc) that fits
    into one of the acceptable categories described at the end of this
    document then you should *immediately* send it to
    "best-of-security@suburbia.net". Do not try and predict whether or
    not someone else will send the item in question to the list in the
    immediate future. Unless your on a time-delayed mail vector such as
    polled uucp or the item has already appeared on best-of-security,
    mail the info to the list!  Even if it is a widely deployed piece of
    information such as a CERT advisory the proceeding argument still
    applies. If the information hasn't appeared on this list yet, then
    SEND IT.  It is far better to run the risk of minor duplication in
    exchange for having the information out where it is needed than act
    conservatively about occasional doubling up on content.

    We do, of course take original posts. In the famous last words of
    CORE DIGEST: "meat, we want meat".

    Consult the below lists for what we will and will not accept. 

WILL WILL WILL WILL                              WONT WONT WONT WONT

8lgm, cert, ciac, dod and other                 Any flames.
non-vendor advisories.			 	Any questions.
Vendor advisories of security			Any rumors.
weaknesses in own or other products.		Sigs with >2 lines of
Vendor new security-product line		commercial information.
release or MAJOR upgrade.			Minor upgrade information.
Fully disclosed security weaknesses.		"there is a hole in X"
Exploitation details.				Any advertising.
Exploitation code.				Subscription, unsubscription or
Patch code.                                     mailing list queries.
Patch announcements.				Any requests.
Hard to obtain or otherwise occulted		Vague or incomprehensible
source code or uuencoded executables.           statements of dysfuctional
Conference announcements.			persons.
Security tools.					Opinionated rantings such as
Blond jokes.					those on the ethics of full
NEW or hard to obtain security                  disclosure or computer hackers.
documents (ascii), or pointers to               Quotes from the Iliad.
the location of such documents/papers.		Old or otherwise well known
Announcements of new security archives		information or pointers to
or mailinglists.				that information.
Human language translations of the above. 	Nonsense.

-- 
"I mean, after all;  you have to consider we're only made out of dust.  That's
 admittedly not  much  to  go  on  and  we  shouldn't  forget  that.  But even
 considering, I mean it's sort of a bad beginning, we're not doing too bad. So
 I personally have faith that even in this lousy situation we're faced with we
 can make it. You get me?" - Leo Bulero/PKD
+---------------------+--------------------+----------------------------------+
|Julian Assange RSO   | PO Box 2031 BARKER | Secret Analytic Guy Union        |
|proff@suburbia.net   | VIC 3122 AUSTRALIA | finger for PGP key hash ID =     |
|proff@gnu.ai.mit.edu | FAX +61-3-98199066 | 0619737CCC143F6DEA73E27378933690 |
+---------------------+--------------------+----------------------------------+

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]